In their own words
No description from the operator yet. If you manage this facility, claim this listing to tell families your side — and respond to the record below. Claimed pages also stop showing nearby alternatives: the page becomes yours alone.
Bringing a pet?Palmelle asks operators about pets directly. Sign in to check this one.Sign in to see pets
The record
CMS Care Compare · Aug 2026| Overall | ★☆☆☆☆ 1 of 5 |
| Health inspection | ★☆☆☆☆ 1 of 5 |
| Staffing | ★★★☆☆ 3 of 5 |
| Quality measures | ★★☆☆☆ 2 of 5 |
Staffing · hours per resident per day
Medication & safety · share of long-stay residents
| Federal fines | $111,093 · 2 penalties |
| Abuse icon | Not flagged |
| Conflict flags in latest reconcile | 4 |
MA does not publish a state inspection feed Palmelle can verify. This record is built from federal data only.
What the pattern says
Palmelle pattern checks · v1Mixed — worth touring with these questions in hand.
- A sedation pattern. Antipsychotic use (36%) and sleep-medication use (32%) are BOTH far above national norms — the pattern associated with medicating residents instead of staffing for them.
- $111,093 in federal fines. 2 penalties in the last 36 months — the citation detail is in the record above.
These checks are computed the same way for every facility. Good patterns and bad ones both print.
Nearby & comparable
Same records, same rulesQuestions families ask
What is the CMS rating for RegalCare at Wakefield?
RegalCare at Wakefield has an overall CMS Care Compare rating of 1 out of 5 stars.
Has RegalCare at Wakefield been cited for resident harm?
RegalCare at Wakefield has $111,093 in federal fines across 2 penalties in the last 36 months. Details appear in the record above.
What should I ask on a tour?
Ask about staff-to-resident ratios by shift, weekend coverage, and any measure flagged red in the record above — those are the places this facility's numbers leave open questions.