In their own words
No description from the operator yet. If you manage this facility, claim this listing to tell families your side — and respond to the record below. Claimed pages also stop showing nearby alternatives: the page becomes yours alone.
Bringing a pet?Palmelle asks operators about pets directly. Sign in to check this one.Sign in to see pets
The record
CMS Care Compare · Aug 2026| Overall | ★★☆☆☆ 2 of 5 |
| Health inspection | ★☆☆☆☆ 1 of 5 |
| Staffing | ★★★☆☆ 3 of 5 |
| Quality measures | ★★★★★ 5 of 5 |
Staffing · hours per resident per day
Medication & safety · share of long-stay residents
| Federal fines | $241,488 · 2 penalties |
| Abuse icon | Not flagged |
| Conflict flags in latest reconcile | 2 |
MI does not publish a state inspection feed Palmelle can verify. This record is built from federal data only.
What the pattern says
Palmelle pattern checks · v1Mixed — worth touring with these questions in hand.
- The falls number is the outlier: 4× the national rate. 7.2% of long-stay residents had a fall with major injury vs 1.6% nationally. Combined with the staffing picture, ask hard questions: one bad cluster, a reporting artifact, or a real problem.
- $241,488 in federal fines. 2 penalties in the last 36 months — the citation detail is in the record above.
These checks are computed the same way for every facility. Good patterns and bad ones both print.
Nearby & comparable
Same records, same rulesQuestions families ask
What is the CMS rating for The Villa at the Bay?
The Villa at the Bay has an overall CMS Care Compare rating of 2 out of 5 stars.
Has The Villa at the Bay been cited for resident harm?
The Villa at the Bay has $241,488 in federal fines across 2 penalties in the last 36 months. Details appear in the record above.
What should I ask on a tour?
Ask about staff-to-resident ratios by shift, weekend coverage, and any measure flagged red in the record above — those are the places this facility's numbers leave open questions.